|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported comparisons between the e-Lybra® and the Bicom® 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have asked existing Bicom® 2000 owners who also use e-Lybra® to report their observations. The quotes below are from the feedback that we received:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-Lybra is more what I would call a complete therapy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bicom® 2000 is about twice as expensive (for a brand new one).
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have to pay on top for all training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It only has about 700 items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have to pay for all software updates which are few hundred pounds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EAV is a testing technique that can take years to perfect (who needs to be trained to put straps round people’s wrists?).
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a very complex system to learn; can take months to get to grips with its operation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a "wet" system; therefore you need body material to treat e.g. hair, skin, nails, blood, saliva, faeces, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are numerous electrodes to apply e.g. headbands, body electrodes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It also relies on a Biotensor to test for imbalances, therefore the therapist forms part of the circuit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is not that portable because it is quite heavy and there are lots of "bits and pieces" to go with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
People don't tend to "feel" the treatment with a Bicom® 2000 in the way they do with the e-Lybra®.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The approach to a Bicom® 2000 treatment is to electronically deliver information to the body which will enable it to return to its correct operational frequency. Researchers at Regumed have identified ranges of frequencies within which specific organs and areas of the body will be found to be in good health; anything outside of these frequencies is therefore deemed to be out of balance and therefore illness will be more likely to manifest. I am not sure whether Bicom® 2000 actually measures the actual frequency of an organ or whether it measures the degree to which the frequency deviates from the ideal value. However, I assume that the actual treatment entails sending a frequency which will correct this discrepancy by reminding the specific organ or body area what the optimal frequency actually is. The actual interface between the client and the system operates on the physical level i.e. through the conduction of an electronic signal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By contrast, the e-Lybra® system uses the principle of bio-resonance to deliver corrective patterns to the client. The information transmitted by e-Lybra® is designed to interface with the etheric body rather than the physical, so the information transmitted is of a finer and faster vibration. The etheric body is effectively the blueprint for the physical body, so any corruption that appears on the etheric level will eventually manifest into the physical. The e-Lybra® approach is a more appropriate form of treatment because the underlying frequency distortion that causes illness is detected within the body template itself, consequently the treatment works on the cause rather than the symptom. Such treatment can be given without the need for the practitioner to be a part of the circuit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The strengths of e-Lybra® compared to Bicom® 2000 are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The e-Lybra® has a much broader range of information to bring to the client which can be more effective treatment in a shorter time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The e-Lybra® is far simpler for the practitioner to operate and less draining in practice as they are not locking into the field of the client as when using the EAV function of the Bicom® 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of information which can be scanned by the e-Lybra® in a treatment session is as vast or focused (small) as the practitioner chooses, meaning that the treatment and analysis are carried out simultaneously rather than one then the other, as with the Bicom® 2000. The changing of the electrodes with the various treatment programmes when using the Bicom® 2000, (which can necessitate the client having to undress on occasions), is cumbersome compared to the ease and simplicity of the e-Lybra’s® wrist bands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The e-Lybra® is portable and compact for ease of transporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The healing effect of the e-Lybra® is never compromised by the physical or emotional state of the practitioner because only the client is directly involved in the test circuit, unlike the Bicom® 2000 test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a far greater chance of clearing the energetic blocks with the patterns of information held in the matrix of the e-Lybra® than with the Bicom® 2000 because the e-Lybra® identifies and applies remedies for the imbalances automatically; with the Bicom® 2000 the practitioner has to tax his brain by thinking of all the pathways that need unblocking rather than spending his time trying to be more creative with the wider aspects of the treatment of the client's health condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With my five years of experience of using the Bicom® 2000 technology I cannot think of any strengths which the Bicom® 2000 may have over the e-Lybra®, chiefly because of the above factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Also
|
|
|
|
Reported comparisons between the e-Lybra®, the BEST, and the QXCI
|
|
|
|
|
|