|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported comparisons between the e-Lybra®, the BEST, and the QXCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strictly speaking it is not a direct comparison to evaluate the BEST system against e-Lybra®. The BEST system obtains its results from EAV testing (electro acupuncture) on the nail bed of the client's fingers and/or toes, so this test is done by measuring the resistance (touching on the skin) and the results are collated as a group of frequencies. Because of this approach the practitioner is also involved (whether consciously or unconsciously) in the results of the test because he/she is electrically and energetically a part of the circuit. The results obtained from BEST can therefore be contaminated with the practitioner's own health factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no room for practitioner input/error with the e-Lybra® as the client is the only one connected into the circuit (via the wristbands). The results of the scan are shown in patterns (of consciousness) which is another “dimension” of resonance, meaning that the information could be held physiologically in the cells of the body and/or in the bio-energetic field (auric field) of the cells, or even in the bio-energetic field of the whole person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The QXCI contains similar categories of information in the form of patterns but the way they are organised and accessed within the whole of the content of this system is very different from the e-Lybra®; the e-Lybra® category selection is very user friendly. As far as effectiveness between the two systems is concerned a recent independent study in Canada by a group of QXCI practitioners who purchased an e-Lybra® showed that the effectiveness of the treatment given by the e-Lybra® was twice as good as the QXCI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the e-Lybra® system
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computer screens on the e-Lybra® are simple to use and to navigate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The basic training is included in the purchase price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective use of the e-Lybra® can be achieved after one training day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software updates are free for the first 3 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 5 minutes of switching on the e-Lybra® a patient can be treated by any practitioner without the need for a complex understanding of the software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Homoeopathic Remedy Production for every pattern within the system (285,000).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ability to analyse and create resonance patterns for viruses and bacterias that do not appear on any other system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does not require the practitioner to be part of the circuit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported disadvantages of the BEST system
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can take many years to perfect the EAV technique.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May take 20 minutes to work through a hierarchical tree to find one item of the body that is out of balance using the manual EAV technique for each part of the analytical path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does not lend itself to making remedies very easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training is expensive as is the initial cost of the equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis and treatment are separate activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requires the practitioner to be a part of the circuit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported disadvantages of the QXCI system
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does not lend itself to making remedies very easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only detects 9000 substances or frequencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training is expensive and on-going.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The initial cost of the equipment is expensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The many screens are very confusing and it takes a lot of practice to be able to work with them without being overwhelmed and frustrated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Also
|
|
|
|
Reported comparisons between the e-Lybra® and the Bicom® 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|